Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Reflection on the Holy Eucharist - Peter Mwale (11074)


The Effects of the Eucharist
Mwale Peter [11074T]
Does the Eucharist have any effect on the one who receives it? And if so, what are the fruits of the Eucharist?  In order to answer these two questions, I will rely on the Catechism of the Catholic Church especially with numbers 1328 – 1398.  According to this section of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, I will single out three main important effects of the Eucharist on those who participate in this sacrament faithfully in the following paragraphs.
The first and most obvious effect of the Eucharist is the union with Christ. Just as our bodies need food to survive, so the body of our Lord Jesus Christ nourishes the new life of God within us which is received at baptism. This life is strengthened as we celebrate and receive the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ in the Eucharist (CCC, 1391). As true meal, the Eucharist is an act of union. This union is principally a personal one, based on knowing and loving God. It is a living and loving communion with Father, Son and Holy Spirit. The Eucharist strengthens and deepens within us that life by which we can know and love Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
The second effect of the Eucharist is the forgiveness of sins, for the celebration of the Eucharist helps us grow in love for God and our neighbor (CCC, 1393). The Eucharistic Sacrifice and Holy Communion purify us from venial sins and give us strength to struggle against greater evil. As we grow in charity and love we are better prepared to resist temptations and to grow more and more in Christian virtues. Through the sacrifice and presence of Jesus in the Holy Eucharist we are united to God for whom sin and evil try to separate us. This notion of forgiveness of sins is central to the Eucharist as it is a sacrifice of atonement. In so far as in the Holy Eucharist we have that same offering of Calvary made present in a ritual way, the Church has always believed that the Eucharist is to be offered for the sins of the living and the dead. The Eucharistic sacrifice reaches its consummation in Holy Communion.
The third effect of the Eucharist is our ever-deepening union with the Church (CCC, 1396).  Holy Communion is very much linked to our bond with the Church. St. Paul reminds us that the Church is the body of Christ and we are its members. Linked to Jesus we are linked to the Church. This is why any playing down of the divine mystery of the Eucharist in the name of some facile ‘relevance’ and superficial ‘togetherness’ is not only false to what God has revealed to His Church about the Eucharist, but it also undermines in advance that genuine human brotherhood which the Eucharist is meant to inspire and deepen.
Finally, each time we receive Holy Communion, we should be reminded that it is a sign of our friendship with Jesus; it should help us to keep and renew the life of grace we received at Baptism and it is should strengthen our love for God, family and neighbour and to wipe away our venial sins, and preserve us from committing mortal sin.




**** 
THE EUCHARIST: Life of the Church - Mwale Peter [11074T]
Pope John Paul II in 2005 issued the apostolic letter, Ecclesia de Eucharistia, on the mystery and worship of the Holy Eucharist. He emphasized that the priest and the deacon have a close relationship with the Eucharist. According to John Paul II, the Eucharist “is the principal and central raison d’etre of the Sacrament of the priesthood. Priests derive from the Eucharist and exist for the Eucharist” (EE, 31). Priests are in a special way responsible for and entrusted with the Eucharist for others. The people of God expect from priests a particular veneration and Eucharistic piety. The Eucharist gives Catholics their unique identity. The non-celebration of the Eucharist because of the shortage of priests weakens this Catholic identity.
The Eucharist is also the source and summit of all that the Church is and does. The breaking of the bread has always been at the centre of the life of the Church. The Eucharist holds within itself the whole spiritual treasure of the Church. Christ Himself is the Sacrament of Unity. He came to reconcile us to God and to each other. He gave his followers, the Church, the role of continuing this mission. Therefore, the Church is a Sacrament of Unity. John Paul II, points out that the Eucharist describes the Church as ‘a Sacrament’ for humanity (EE, 22).
As “source and summit” of the Church’s life, the Eucharist itself is essentially a Sacrament of Unity. John Paul states that: “In the sacrament of the Eucharistic bread, the unity of the faithful, who form one body in Christ, is both expressed and brought about” (EE, 21). It is interesting to note that the Eucharist not just as and ‘expression’ of unity achieved, but also as a means for ‘bringing about’ unity. There is a ‘unifying power of sharing in the Eucharist” (EE, 23).
Today, when we speak of the ‘Real Presence’ we normally mean the sacramental presence of Christ in the Eucharist under the form of bread and wine. And when we speak of the ‘Mystical Body’, we normally mean the Church. For more than half of the Church’s history – that is, until the twelfth century – the very opposite was true. The ‘real’ body of Christ was the Church. And the ‘mystical’ body of Christ was the sacramental bread and wine. When we see this usage in operation in the passage from St John Chrysostom which John Paul quotes in his Encyclical on the Eucharist (EE, 20).
Eucharistic adoration is another act of witnessing when one sees many gathered in silence before the Lord. Adoration should become part and parcel of our way of being Church. Every Eucharist unites us with the adoration of the whole Communion of Saints and reminds us of our unity with our whole human family alive today. John Paul II says that he has celebrated Mass in all sorts of places on his travels, yet he is always aware that even in the humblest of settings, Mass is still celebrated “on the altar of the world” (EE, 8). This brings out its ‘cosmic character’ of the Eucharist.
In conclusion, the Pope uses the beautiful phrase, “Eucharistic amazement” (EE, 6). At the end of the same paragraph, he links it to the disciples of the Emmaus road and says we can “re-live their experience, when their eyes were opened and they recognized him.” Through the ministry of the priest, Christ entrusted to us a memorial of his own passion and resurrection. The memorial makes effectively present here and now an event in the past, the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. The power of these events touches and transforms us (EE, 31).
***

MWALE PETER [11074T]
The Role of the Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion

The topic on the role of the Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion is very important in our Church and needs careful consideration. It has been clarified a number of times in the Redemptionis Sacramentum (RS) which was issued by the Congregation of Divine Worship in 2004 and in the General Instructions of the Roman Missal (GIRM).These valuable documents addresses the mystery of the Eucharist and the norms pertaining to the respect to be given to the Eucharist by its ministers.
The ordinary minister of Holy Communion is a bishop, priest or a deacon. Any other authorized minister is always considered extraordinary, that is, exceptional. This means that when there are enough priests or deacons present at Mass, it is their duty to distribute Communion. It is not the duty of other ministers, and it would be incorrect for these ministers to distribute the Holy Communion (RS, 88). More especially, the Church disapproves of priests or deacons who are able to distribute Communion but who do not do so, rather letting laypersons do this instead.
The services of extraordinary ministers of Holy Communion are required only for reasons of real necessity, and must not be regarded as the norm (RS, 88). When there is only one priest and possibly one deacon, as happens often during well attended Sunday Masses, the Instruction allows the extraordinary ministers to assist in the distribution. Also, if the priest is prevented by weakness or advanced age from giving Communion at Mass, the services of the extraordinary ministers will be necessary.
In the parish liturgy there is generally no problem because both priest and people appreciate that if only one or two are giving out Communion to large numbers of communicants, it can prolong the Mass unduly. In unforeseen circumstances, the Instruction says the priest may depute a person who is not a commissioned extraordinary minister to administer Communion for that single occasion. These are some of the things the extraordinary ministers are expected to do. What they may not do is to ask other persons who are not extraordinary ministers to take over from them and distribute Communion. The Instruction specifically will not allow an extraordinary minister permit a family member of a sick person to give Communion to that person, unless, naturally, the family member has been commissioned by the Church as an extraordinary minister.
The taking of Communion to the sick often leaves much to be desired in some places. Usually consecrated hosts are distributed to lay ministers after Communion. Lay ministers carrying Communion often stop to chat with friends before going to the sick. At times they rush to shop before proceeding to the sick. Some keep the consecrated hosts at home because they did not find the sick person or because on their return, they found the church locked.
To conclude: “ In an altogether particular manner, let everyone do all that is in their power to ensure that the Most Holy Sacrament of the Eucharist will be protected from any and every irreverence or distortion and that all abuses be thoroughly corrected. This is a most serious duty incumbent upon each and every one, and all are bound to carry it out without any favouristism” (RS, 183).


RECOGNIZING HIM IN THE BREAKING OF BREAD
Peter Mwale

The reflection is inspired by the topic we dealt with in class on the short History of the Eucharistic Doctrine especially on the Biblical Evidence. I want to focus much on some of the letters of St Paul as regards how the disciples of Jesus recognized him in the breaking of the bread and it is impact on their lives and how it can influence us.
The disciples recognized the Lord in the specific act of breaking the bread. Breaking bread and sharing it was a deeply symbolic act for the Jews, but it was all the more so for the disciples as it evoked the memory of the last meal they had shared with Jesus before he was crucified. It is a symbol that captures the central thrust of the life and death of Jesus – his self-emptying love, his complete giving of himself, his final testament. “On the night he was betrayed, the Lord Jesus took some bread, and after he had given thanks, he broke it, and he said, “This is my body, which is for you; do this in remembrance of me” (1Cor. 11:24-25).
The Eucharist is above all else a memorial of the dying of Jesus: “Whenever you eat this bread then, and drink this cup, you are proclaiming the Lord’s death until he comes” (1Cor. 11:26). Proclaiming the Lord’s death, holding it up in an act of worship and emulation, in a declaration that one identifies with it, in a public commitment that one wants to do likewise. For the disciple, it is the touchstone of his life, the act that gives meaning to his existence, the assurance that grounds the hope that keeps him going. It enables him to say with St Paul, “I live now, not I, but Christ lives in me, with Christ I hang on the cross” (Gal. 2:19).
The breaking of bread is both an act of participation in the death of Jesus and a concretization of his risen presence among us. It is both a memorial of his dying and an actualization of his redemptive mission, a furtherance of his work among us. It both re-enacts his act of total giving on Calvary and absorbs the present into the gathering together of all things in the Kingdom, into that great communion of all things in Christ. It is a sacred sign that effects what it signifies: it impels one outward to the service of the poor.
And finally when we recognize Christ in the breaking of the bread, we are invited to be in Christ in His reaching out to the poor. To share in the Lord’s Supper is to commit oneself to the breaking of bread with the multitude. 


THE EUCHARIST AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER SACRAMENTS
MWALE PETER [11074T]

The Post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation Sacramentum Caritatis of the Holy Father Benedict XVI on the Eucharist as the Source and Summit of the Church’s Life and Mission, “seeks to take up the richness and variety of the reflections and proposals which emerged from the recent Ordinary General Assembly of Synod of Bishops…and to offer some basic directions aimed at a renewed commitment to Eucharistic enthusiasm and fervor in the Church”.[1]  In this reflection I will focus is on the relationship that the Eucharist has with the other sacraments based on this document.
The Eucharistic celebration gives us a new understanding and purpose to our life because of a new relationship and link it has to other sacraments. It is the centre and summit of our Church and Christian life. As such it relates and sustains other sacraments as they draw life from its Trinitarian communion.[2]
“If the Eucharist is truly the source and summit of the Church’s life and mission, it follows that the process of Christian initiation must constantly be directed to the reception of this sacrament”. [3] In Baptism we are reborn into God’s family and acquire new life in Christ. The Eucharist nourishes and perfects the baptismal graces of this new life. In Confirmation we are strengthened by the Eucharist to be true disciples of the Lord as we witness to the baptismal promises through the gift of the Holy Spirit. Hence the Eucharist plays a big role in strengthening the bond and relationship of the sacraments of Christian Initiation.
“The Synod Fathers rightly stated that a love for the Eucharist leads to a growing appreciation of the Sacrament of Reconciliation”.[4]  It is true that the Christians experience God’s love and forgiveness in the sacrament of reconciliation as they are reconciled to each other and to God. The Eucharist is related to the sacrament of reconciliation in that it recreates an intrinsic relationship of healing and forgiveness in the community through the sacrifice of Christ.  In the Sacrament of the Anointing of the Sick, “ the Eucharist shows how Christ’s sufferings and death have been transformed into love,… for this part, unites the sick with Christ’s self-offering for the salvation of all, so that they too, within the mystery of the communion of saints, can participate in the redemption of the world”.[5]  In the Sacrament of Anointing of the Sick, Christ reaches out to those suffering and this brings healing and comfort to them. In the Eucharist there is also the reaching out of Christ to us and this heals our brokenness and relationships with each other and God.
“The Eucharist, as the sacrament of charity, has a particular relationship with the love of man and woman united in marriage”.[6] It strengthens the unity and love of the marriage of Christians. The “marriage bond is intrinsically linked to the Eucharistic unity of Christ the Bridegroom and his Bride, the Church (cf. Eph 5:31-32)”.[7]  In the Eucharist, Christ gives himself out to us willingly and out of love. And finally in the Sacrament of Holy Orders, “the connection between Holy Orders and the Eucharist is seen most clearly at Mass, when the Bishop or priest presides in the person of Christ the Head”.[8]
Finally, the Eucharist leads all believers to live their lives in a new manner in that all sacraments are interrelated to it and the recipients of these sacraments share in the life of the Trinity and of the Church. This experience is renewed at every Eucharistic celebration since the goal and aim of this experience is to help Christians to grow more and more into the image of Christ



[1] Benedict Xvi, Sacramentum Caritatis, 5.
[2] Cf. Benedict Xvi, Sacramentum Caritatis, 16.
[3] Benedict Xvi, Sacramentum Caritatis, 17.
[4] Benedict Xvi, Sacramentum Caritatis, 20.
[5] Benedict Xvi, Sacramentum Caritatis, 22.
[6] Benedict Xvi, Sacramentum Caritatis, 27.
[7] Benedict Xvi, Sacramentum Caritatis, 27.
[8] Benedict Xvi, Sacramentum Caritatis, 23.

Monday, February 25, 2013

Reflections on the Eucharist - Chipondo Karol - 11095


Reflection on The Holy Communion: ‘Redemptionis sacramentum’ (no.80-107)
The Holy Communion is an encounter with Christ, in which we receive Christ into our bodies, so that we may be completely assimilated into his body. Therefore, when the priest says, "The body of Christ", when administering the host, and, "The blood of Christ", when presenting the chalice, the communicant who receives either body or blood receives the whole and entire Christ. The Holy Communion also strengthens the individual because in it, Jesus himself forgives our venial sins and gives us the strength to resist mortal sins.
Who Can Receive Holy Communion?
The Holy Communion is the most holy sacrament; therefore those who receive it must be in a state of grace. The Catholic baptized who is prepared can receive the body and blood of Jesus Christ. However, there are circumstances when non-Catholics may receive Communion from a Catholic priest. This is especially the case when it comes to Eastern Orthodox Christians, who share the same faith concerning the nature of the sacraments: Catholic ministers may “licitly administer the sacraments of penance, Eucharist and anointing of the sick to members of the oriental churches which do not have full Communion with the Catholic Church, if they ask on their own for the sacraments and are properly disposed” (Can.844). This holds also for members of other churches, which in the judgment of the Apostolic See are in the same condition as the oriental churches as far as these sacraments are concerned. Christians in these churches should, of course, respect their own church’s guidelines regarding when it would be permissible for them to receive Communion in a Catholic church. 
How to receive Holy Communion?
Holy Communion may be received either in the hand or on the tongue depending on the recommendation of the conference of the bishops. Once implemented the option to receive Communion either in the hand or on the tongue always remains with the communicant. However, special care should be taken to ensure that “host is consumed by the communicant in the presence of the minister” (no. 92). No minister may refuse a communicant Communion on the tongue except when Communion is being given by intinction; in that case, it must be given on the tongue.  After they have received the Holy Communion, it is appropriate to stay after Mass and thank Jesus for coming to their life in the Holy Eucharist.

            

Karol Michael Chipondo (1195T)
Title: Mary and the Eucharist.
              The sixth chapter of The Ecclesia de Eucharistia, ‘at the school of Mary , ‘a woman of the Eucharist’ The Pope sensibly and innovatively gives a reflection on the surprising analogy between  Mary, mother of God, and the Church. Mary who by bearing the body of Jesus in her womb became the first ‘tabernacle’ and the Church which in her heart preserves and offers to the whole world body and blood of Christ through the sacrament of the Eucharist. The Eucharist is given to the believers so that their life may become a continuous magnificent in honor of the most holy Trinity.
           Mary certainly participates in the Holy mass from the very beginning of the Church’s life of the first Community of the Apostles after the Ascension of our Lord Jesus Christ. She continued praying with Apostles for the coming of the Holy Spirit. By exercising her ecclesial maternity, Mary leads the pilgrim church to the heavenly banquet. Her disposition of faith can be witnessed on her response to the Angel during the Annunciation. At her words “Let it be done to me as you say” God the son came into the world by becoming incarnate in her womb through the overshadowing of the Message of the Angel.
        At the moment of the incarnation, Mary anticipated what happens for the faithful at every Eucharist celebration. Christ becomes present in the Church, under the species of bread and wine so that we may receive Him into our very being. Similarity between Mary’s belief in the words of the Angel and our belief in approaching Holy communion is that, when the Priest announces, “The body of Christ” we all respond ‘Amen’ our Amen is similar to the respond of Mary to the Angel ‘fiat’ that is ‘let it be done as you said’.
      Mary also anticipated the Eucharist by her whole life. The church’s shares the sacrifice of Christ through the participation of the holy Eucharist. As Mary also from the very moment of the incarnation poured out, with the incarnated son. She is always present is the celebration of the Holy Eucharist. The church never celebrates the Holy Eucharist without commemorating the blessed mother of God. She is always present during the mass and she leading and intercede the church to Christ and leading her to be obedient to Christ “Do whatever He tells you”(Jn 2:5). In this relationship we also see in Mary a most holy and perfect fulfillment of the 'sacramental' way that God comes down to meet His creatures and involves them in His saving work. From Mary we must learn to become brothers and sisters of the Eucharist and of the Church.

****

Name: Karol Michael Chipondo.(1195T)
Title. ‘The Eucharist a mystery to be believed’
             The first section of the document, Sacramentum Caritatis of The Holy Father Benedict XVI ‘the Eucharist, a Mystery to be believed’, highlights the free gift of the Blessed Trinity and it illustrates the mystery of the Eucharist on the basis of its Trinitarian origin, which ensures it always to remain a gift. In this mystery there are profound roots of what the Exhortation says concerning adoration and its intrinsic relationship with Eucharistic celebration. The Eucharist is the sacrament of faith, meaning that the Eucharist has to be understood as the real body and blood of Christ himself which is present in the species of bread and wine. These elements of the Eucharist are the Trinitarian Love of God that was manifested by His own son on the cross through death and resurrection.

          In relation to the life of Jesus and the work of the Spirit, the document considers the institution of the Eucharist in relation to the Jewish Paschal supper. This meal is decisive passage that illuminates the radical 'novum' that Christ brought to the ancient ritual meal. During the last supper, Jesus and his Apostles commemorated, the ritual meal relating to the history of Israel. In this meal, Jesus introduces the newness of his gift by The Institution of the sacrament of the Eucharist. At the same time, He is real himself as the true sacrifice lamb of destined to God’s plan of human salvation.

        The document also added that; In the rites of the Eucharistic celebration of the mass, we do not repeat an act chronologically which situated during Jesus' Last Supper, rather we celebrate the Eucharist as a radical 'novum' of Christian worship. As the believers we are called to enter in the sacramental life of the Church. The sacraments give us a real foretaste of the eschatological fulfillment of our destined. Man was created for that true and eternal happiness which only God’s love can give Jesus calls us to enter the mystery of death and resurrection, the innovative beginning of the transformation of human history and all the universe. Moreover, to move toward the right way we all need to be guided by Jesus Christ himself.

****

THE EUCHARIST BUILDS THE CHURCH
Chipondo Karol (11O95T)
The ‘Eucharist builds the church’, is a second chapter in the encyclical letter by John Paul II, “ECCLESIA DE EUCHARISTIA”. The Pope starts by quoting from the second Vatican Council of the Catholic Church, which states that, the Eucharist is at the centre of the process of the church’s growth. That, when the faithful approach the sacred banquet during the celebration of the Eucharist, they receive Christ who in ever present is sacred species of Bread and Wine. Besides, Christ receives each one of us in return; hence it forms a complete sealed friendship. This becomes a fraternal unity between the members of the church and with Christ who is the head of the church. By this union the church becomes a sacrament of redemption whereby it open the door to salvation of all humanity. In this way, the church continues the work of Christ by drowning the real strength from the Holy Spirit who is within the church’s mission.
The consecrated Bread and Wine is the force within the church which generates the unity among the faithful and also between the church and Christ. It is the sacramental union in which Christ continues his works of redemption with those who believes on this communion with the Son of God. The Eucharistic sacrifice is the sacrifice of Christ himself who is really present in the sacred species of bread and wine. Christ is the victim in this senses, he is the priest and principal who work through the presence of the minister. At the same time the Eucharist is the sacrifice of the church. It is the sacramental sacrifice which exists only for the good of the church and her members. It is through this mystery that we become the body of Christ. By her union with Christ the church becomes a sacrament for the salvation of all people; therefore, it continues the work of Christ.
The church is united to her Lord who veiled by the Eucharist species, which dwells within her and builds her up. The church worships the Lord not only at the celebration of the holy mass itself, but this is extended even outside and other times. The church cherishes the Lord in all times because of what the Lord has done and also for all most precious treasures of his words and deeds to the church. Actually, the fruit of every Eucharist celebration is an ever greater development of the life of the church. Its presence is ever in the church even after the Eucharistic celebration. The worship of the Eucharist outside the holy mass unites the faithful in the love of Christ even after mass. This worship is linked to the commands of Christ ‘Do this in memory of me’

Reflections on the Holy Eucharist Elvis Gwangwava - 11065 T

The Most Sacred Mystery of the Eucharist
 The Council in the second chapter of Sacrosanctum Concilium declares that the Saviour’s “Eucharistic sacrifice of his Body and Blood,” was instituted at the Last Supper so as “to perpetuate the sacrifice of the Cross throughout the ages.”  Since the benefits of the Eucharist, namely the inflowing of grace and promise of eternal glory, are precisely those which were obtained for us on the Cross the faithful should offer the Eucharistic sacrifice “not only through the hands of the priest but also together with him” and they should also “offer themselves.” When the Council prescribes that the faithful should “offer themselves,” this is not meant in substitution or supplement of Christ as the sacrificial victim that we offer ourselves as members of the mystical body of Christ. It is not in virtue of our merits, but of Christ’s, that this sacrifice has efficacy. In order to achieve fuller participation by the faithful in the Mass, the Council issued nine decrees regarding Masses where the faithful are present.
First, the rite of the Mass should be revised so “that the intrinsic nature and purpose of its several parts, as well as the connection between them, may be more clearly manifested and that the devout and active participation by the faithful may be more easily achieved.” (SC, 50) The concrete means of achieving this end is to simplify the rites, “due care being taken to preserve their substance.”  In a second decree, the Council calls for a more diverse set of Scripture readings to be used at Mass over a cycle of several years. However, the special theme of each Sunday and feast was not effaced, since we can take similar Gospel readings, though taken from different evangelists on different cycle years. A third decree announces that the homily should become a proper part of the liturgy, not to be omitted on Sundays and holy days and its subject matter should be faith and morals, based on an exposition of the Scriptural readings (SC, 52).  The fourth decree explicitly calls for the restoration of the “common prayer” or “prayer of the faithful” of which the laity are to participate in this prayer for intercessions on behalf of the Church, civil authorities, those in need, and for all mankind and its salvation (SC, 53).
The fifth decree gives more definite form to the proposed usage of the vernacular during the Mass where “a suitable place may be allotted to the mother tongue.” (SC, 54). “Nevertheless steps should be taken so that the faithful may also be able to say or to sing together in Latin those parts of the Ordinary of the Mass which pertain to them.” A sixth decree recommends that Holy Communion be offered to the laity at all Masses after the priest’s communion. However it shall be noted that lay communion is explicitly prescribed to be distinct from and posterior to the priest’s communion. The Council proposes the reception of communion under both kinds only in highly restricted circumstances, where such reception is consonant with the special event and does not give occasion to the error that reception under one kind is a less perfect or incomplete form of the sacrament.  In the seventh decree, the Council describes the two parts of the Mass as “the liturgy of the Word and the Eucharistic liturgy.”  The eighth and ninth decrees provide for broader application of priestly concelebration at Mass. The Council does not give a general indult, but instead allows the use of concelebration only in these determinate cases. However, the diocesan bishop has the authority to determine which Masses will be concelebratory, yet each priest retains the right to celebrate his own Mass, “though not at the same time in the same church as a concelebrated Mass, nor on Thursday of the Lord's Supper.” (SC, 57)
In conclusion, all the decrees we have seen above were meant to help us understand what Eucharist means to the Church and what role it plays in her life. The various decrees also give us the basic guidelines to allow beauty and sacredness in our liturgy.

***************************************

The Other Sacraments and the Sacramentals


The Second Vatican Council’s changes to the Mass are the most noticeable reform of public worship for most Catholics and yet there are other changes by this Constitution which are very important. In the third chapter of Sacrosanctum Concilium we have sacraments and sacramental discussed at large. This short work shall serve to explore this chapter and what the Church expects us to do.
In this chapter, the Council is fully aware that the sacraments, in addition to administering grace, serve as forms of instruction in the faith and that inappropriate changes in the administration of the sacraments may obscure their true meaning or substitute an erroneous meaning in the minds of those hearing the words spoken. Therefore, any change in the sacramental rites must retain the orthodox meaning of the sacraments and express this clearly. As a result, the Council justifies the need to reform the rites of sacraments and sacramentals by saying some changes have become necessary to adapt them to the needs of our own times for the effectiveness of a symbol is determined not by its intrinsic nature alone, but by its intelligibility to those who are to receive it (SC, 62). To this end, new rites with local adaptations may be proposed by bishops’ conference, and are subject to approval by the Holy See.
Meanwhile, we may review the brief norms for ritual reform proposed by the Council. First, the Constitution calls for the restoration of the catechumenate for adults to ensure that the faithful understand what they profess to believe. The Council also calls for a shorter rite to be drawn up for use by catechists in mission countries, or even lay faithful, who may baptize if there is danger of imminent death and no priest or deacon is available (SC, 68). The council also insists that there should be a new, distinct rite for (non-infant) converts who were validly baptized and it should say that they are now admitted into communion with the Church (SC, 69). With regard to Confirmation, the Council proposes to restore to its role as a part of Christian initiation. On Penance, the Council says only that the rite should be revised to “more clearly express both the nature and effect of the sacrament.” (SC, 72) In keeping with the aim of distinguishing the Anointing of the Sick from a death rite, the Council notes that the Anointing and the Viaticum may be performed as separate and distinct rites.
The Council also calls for the revision of the rites for sacramentals, in keeping with the general principle of encouraging lay understanding and participation. The revised rites should take modern culture into account. Actually the Council went further in making the sacramentals more widely available, allowing even “qualified lay persons” to do so, “at least in special circumstances and at the discretion of the ordinary.” (SC, 79 Here, however, the Council seems to have opened the door for a much broader lay administration of sacramentals. The same Council continues to call for a revision to the rite of Consecration of Virgins in the Pontificale Romanum, but gives no reason (SC, 80). In Fact, the modern rite of consecration of virgins living in the world does not prescribe the rule of any religious order, but only that the vow of virginity be kept, and that the virgin should pray on behalf of the faithful in her locality. The Church elevates religious professions by including them in her public liturgy, the Mass, rather than treating them as private devotions.
From this we can see that the main aim of any changes and reforms in the Church is to enhance faith. The Church is very cautious when it comes to safe-guarding her faith and tries by all means not to error in the same area; sacraments and sacramentals are no exception.

******************************************

The Catholic approach to the Bible - Sacred Scripture

The papal document Verbum Domini issued by Pope Benedict XVI, is an apostolic exhortation discussing the Catholic approach to the Bible - Sacred Scripture, and it is quite impressive. Verbum Domini explores both theological foundations concerning the Word of God and practical applications that allow our Scripture study to affect our mission as the Church, Verbum Domini is a beautiful discussion of the necessity of Scripture in our daily lives.
It is important to note that this is not an encyclical, but a “post-synodal apostolic exhortation”. The difference is mainly that an encyclical will usually be almost exclusively theological and leave practical applications to other forums while this exhortation, which was written as a response to the 2008 Synod of Bishops on the Word of God, tackles both theological issues as well as practical applications of those issues. We shall now have a glimpse at the document which is divided into three major sections, apart from the introduction and conclusion:
Verbum Dei
This unit sets the theological foundations of the Church’s understanding of the Word of God. The multiple meanings of “Word of God” are very much stressed in this document and great emphasis that the Scripture can only be properly understood in the context of the living Church is given. As a matter of fact, this first unit of the document says it all for it is beautifully written and gives a great explanation of the overall context in which the Church approaches the Bible.
Verbum in Ecclesia
In this the second unit, Verbum Domini elaborates how Scripture is to be read, interpreted and prayed in the life of the Church. The role of the liturgy for a proper interpretation of the Scriptures is emphasised in a very special way in order to give life to Sacred Scripture, something that is sorely forgotten in our post-Reformation era. Most Christians think that the Bible is something to be primarily read alone in one’s home, but the Church has always emphasised that the “privileged” setting for reading and interpreting the Scriptures is in the context of the worshiping Church, that is, the liturgy. As a result, Scripture should not only be used for Mass but rather it should infuse every liturgical action. Lectio Divina - “Divine reading” is considered the proper way in which a Christian should approach the biblical text when doing personal study and reflection of the Scriptures, and it would be great if more Christians used this ancient method when reading the Bible.

Verbum Mundo
The third and final unit of Verbum Domini is the application of everything discussed above to the “real world”, that is; how can our interaction with the Sacred Scriptures further the Church’s mission to the world? This document applies these discussions to every conceivable arena, from evangelisation to supporting the poor and to interreligious dialogue. The overall emphasis of this unit of the document is evangelisation and so one must be in constant contact with the Word of God in order to preach and proclaim that Word to the world.
********************************************

Eucharist - the life of the Church


In the encyclical letter “Ecclesia de Eucharistia” Pope John Paul II speaks about the Eucharist as the life of the Church. This encyclical letter was given in Rome in 2003, the year of Eucharist. This work shall however focus on how the Eucharist builds up the Church as Pope John Paul presents in the Second Chapter of Ecclesia de Eucharistia.
The Holy Father, Pope John Paul II considers the Holy Eucharist as the source of the strength and growth of the Church. The Holy Father is inspired by the teaching of the Second Vatican Ecumenical Council, which reminds us that the work of our redemption continues to be carried out in the Church, principally by the offering of the Sacrifice of the Mass. This goes back to the Beginnings of the Church where the celebration of the Holy Eucharist was, in fact, the source of her life. The Last Supper, which is the First Eucharist, “laid the foundations of the new messianic community, the People of God of the New Covenant,”. It is through this institution of the Holy Eucharist, that our Lord made it possible for us to become one body with Him. Therefore, at the celebration of the Holy Mass, the Church receives her mission which is to share in the mystery of Christ’s Suffering, Dying and Rising from the Dead while she also expresses most fully the same mission of bringing all mankind into communion with God — Father, Son and Holy Spirit .
The Holy Eucharist nourishes the life of Christ within us from the moment of our baptism. And the same Holy Eucharist confirms the unity of the many members of Christ. Now the Holy Spirit unceasingly nourishes and strengthens Christ’s life within us through the incomparable spiritual food which is the Body and Blood of Christ. Hence each time we participation in the Eucharistic Sacrifice and Banquet we share in the divine communion which alone can bring mankind to unity and peace. The Holy Eucharist, communion with Christ strengthens us to overcome, with Christ, the division which sin always introduces into our lives. And so, receiving the Body and Blood of Christ enlightens our minds and inflames our hearts to see what keeps us from unity with God and with each other, and to root out from our hearts these seeds of disunity.
The Holy Father also underlines the importance of worship of the Blessed Sacrament outside of Mass - prayer before the Blessed Sacrament he says that it is spending time with the Lord. Through prayer before the Blessed Sacrament, we experience the inexhaustible love of the glorious Sacred Heart of Jesus, from which Christ unceasingly pours forth His grace upon us. To emphasise his point, our Holy Father quotes Saint Alphonsus Liguori who says: “Of all devotions, that of adoring Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament is the greatest after the sacraments, the one dearest to God and the one most helpful to us”.
In a nutshell, through the Holy Eucharist, first of all by participation in the Sacrifice of the Mass and then by Eucharistic worship outside of Mass, we contemplate the Face of Christ as directly and fully as is possible for us on this earth. From our contemplation of the Face of Christ, we will draw the grace to live in Christ every day. It is the Holy Eucharist, above all, which builds up the Church in unity and love.

********************************************





Reflections on the Apostolic Exhortation SacramentumCaritatisby Pope Benedict XVI
 Elvis Gwangwava (11065T)

The Eleventh Ordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops gave birth to theApostolic ExhortationSacramentumCaritatis by Pope Benedict XVI in which he develops and deepens the propositions of the Synod. He deals with many vital matters, crucial for the community of believers and for humanity itself "aimed at a renewed commitment to Eucharistic enthusiasm and fervour in the Church" (SC, 5). The Pope specially encourages families to draw inspiration and strength from this Sacrament.
By the virtue of Baptism, Christian existence is a nuptial dimension with God; and the Cross itself is present and active in the Eucharist.Therefore, due to its sacramental character, the matrimonial bond is an intrinsic sign of the sacred unity between Christ the Bridegroom and the Church, his Bride (SC, 27)."Christ gave birth to the Church as his Bride and his body" duringhis sacrifice on the Cross and this "leads us to reflect on the underlying connection between Christ's sacrifice, the Eucharist and the Church" (SC, 14). The Holy Father, thus,in this document summarises various elements that have been reaffirmed in the Papal Magisterium
Pope Benedict XVI puts it in black and white that Baptism and Confirmation leads to entry into the Eucharistic community, especially to reception of the Eucharist and to the "importance of a personal encounter with Jesus" (SC, 19). It is this Eucharist that inexhaustibly strengthens the indissoluble unity and love of every Christian marriage. It is also necessary to note, he says, that in the family, women have a unique mission "that needs to be defended, protected and promoted" because they are the first catechists (SC, n. 27).
On the basis of the nuptial character of the Eucharist, the Holy Father, with balance and depth, addresses the problem of polygamy with an invitation to the radical newness of Christ, in whom the human life-plan is integrated in accordance with the original model of God's design. He however acknowledges that this topic causes deep pastoral concerns in various regions. The Holy Father continues reaffirming the indissoluble ties of the marriage bond in the light of the Eucharist, which expresses the irreversibility of God's love in Christ for his Church and thus discourages divorce. To those who,unfortunately, are unable to fulfil the new bonds of marriage because of objective conditions, the Pope says that they should live “their relationship in fidelity to the demands of God's law, as friends, as brother and sister" (SC, 29).And he also lists several ways to participate in the life of the Ecclesial Community.
The Holy Father calls, Catholic politicians and legislators, due to their grave responsibility before society, to feel particularly bound by their conscience, to introduce and support laws inspired by values grounded in human nature.Pope Benedict XVI quotes St Paul when he said that those who partake in the Eucharist in sin shall face judgement, and thus gives an objective connection with the Eucharist (cf. I Cor. 11:27-29) and so“Bishops are bound to reaffirm constantly these values as part of their responsibility to the flock entrusted to them" (SC, 83).
Due to the complex cultural context which the Church today encounters in many countries, the Pope recommends maximum pastoral attention in training couples preparing for marriage.Pastoral agents should also help them ascertainbeforehand their convictions regarding the obligations required for the validity of the Sacrament of Matrimony. "Marriage and the family are institutions that must be promoted and defended from every possible misrepresentation of their true nature, since whatever is injurious to them is injurious to society itself" (SC, 29).
In a nutshell, in SacramentumCaritatis, the Holy Father tries to give us a very strong link between the Eucharist and other sacraments for it is a ‘Sacrament of Charity’. This leaves us in a situation where we realise that every moment of Christian life is the celebration of the sacraments.

Reflection on the Holy Eucharist - Oswald Nkyanungi (11045T)


REFLECTION 5: THE THEOLOGY OF THE WORDS OF INSITITUTION in Jesus of Nazareth, by Benedict XVI.
Name: Nkyanungi  Oswald               Reg No: 11045T
Holy father Benedict xvi seeks to express the meanings of the words and actions of our lord Jesus at the last supper. Two actions he states are recounted from all the four versions of the institution narratives. i.e. Mark/ Mathew on one hand and Paul/Luke on the other. “We are told that Jesus took the bread, saying over it a prayer of blessing and thanksgiving, and that then he broke and distributed the bread.”[1] This indeed presents the Eucharist as a meal of remembrance and thanksgiving for God’s goodness to all of us his people in the world. It is difficult for one to eat without giving thanks first to the one source of food.
The second action was that Jesus “broke the bread” was a sign of hospitality. The breaking and distributing benedict XVI emphasizes that Jesus Christ creates a community. It is indeed the action in which God the father himself gives and communicates himself through his only son to all human kind as a sign of his great love. Indeed it is this self-gift that the mystery of the Eucharist symbolizes. “The breaking of bread and distributing it is an act of attending lovingly to those in need which is an intrinsic dimension of the Eucharist.”[2]
The words spoken over the bread and wine “This is my body” for Jesus meant the whole of him, not only the flesh at the expense of the spirit. As benedict emphasizes indeed these words match very well with our lord’s confession “No one takes my life from me, but I lay it down of my own accord” (Jn 10:18). It is through this that he becomes a lamb slaughtered for the forgiveness of sins of all humankind.
The hope of the “new covenant” is the one that arises in contrast to the old covenant that was built on the weak human will but now written permanently on men’s hearts. In addition, Jesus blood was shed “for many” and “for all”. It’s very interesting to agree as the Holy Father writes that the word “for” is indeed characteristic of Jesus’ life not only at the last supper. It was a life that was lived for the sake of others not for his sake. Finally though Jesus’ death was meant “for all”, the range of the sacrament is more limited to the many who participate in it .e those who respond to it in faith in contrast to all.




[1] Benedict XVI, Jesus of Nazareth, 103.
[2] Benedict XVI, Jesus of Nazareth, 104.

****


REFLECTION 4: THE REAL PRESENCE AND TRANSSIGNIFICATION by Joseph. M. Powers
Name: Nkyanungi Oswald                Reg No: 11045T
The ideas of Schillebeeckx as presented by powers on the real presence indeed require attention. For Schillebeeckx, there is need to undertake a contemporary analysis in order to understand the Eucharist presence of Christ. He emphasizes that “Dogma must be re interpreted both in order to be able to preserve the soundness of the dogma itself and in order to give men of this age a new possibility of experiencing the truth of church’s behalf”[1]
To Schillebeeckx, some factors have contributed to the present attempts of re-evaluating traditional explanations of the Eucharistic dogma. The first being conflict between the Aristotelian philosophy of nature and contemporary physics. Secondly was the rediscovering of the principle of the sacrament being in the sign-value and function of the sacraments that clarified the state of the question of the real presence. Thirdly was the attempt to interpret what Trent meant by the “substance of bread”, from the point of view of the new world view. Fourthly was the re-statement of the “real presence of Christ” in the Sacramentum Concillium of Vatican II. And finally the ecumenical endeavors with its vision of the genuineness of the ecclesial character of protestant churches.
Schillebeeckx based on the New Testament background of the eschatological communion with Christ who is now at work in his body the church. Indeed reality is not of man’s own making rather the Eucharist is aimed at presenting the proclamation of the death of the lord in a meal constituted basing on the mystery of our faith i.e. as an anamnesis (memorial) of the Christ event to us his people present in the world of today.
The different levels of perception he highlights indeed exist in our world of reality today. It is indeed difficult to mix up realities that exist on these two different levels i.e. physical reality and metaphysical or spiritual reality. It is difficult to perceive the same reality at both levels in the same way. That is why the Eucharist remains a mystery to many because “Tran signification” reveals a change in the signifying function of the appearances. Bread and wine change as a spiritual reality which does not necessarily mean that the physical level can be able to realize this change by our own human perception.




[1] J.M.Powers, Eucharistic Theology, 146.

****

REFLECTION 3: THE EUCHARIST, A MYSTERY TO BE OFFFERED TO THE WORLD.
From Sacramentum Caritatis by Benedict XVI
Name: Nkyanungi Oswald                   Reg No: 11045T
The Eucharist as bread broken for the life of the world reveals the meaning of Jesus, gift to all people. It also reveals Jesus’ deep compassion and love for every man and woman. Since each Eucharistic celebration reenacts the Jesus event to all of us to draw from it the example the master himself gave to us in his life. The example of his solidarity with sinners, the most disadvantaged among others, all these we as his disciples need to incorporate in our daily lives if we are to make the Eucharist our “let vivendi” into our practical lives.
The Eucharist as bread that is broken is also a reminder to us to break ourselves for the services of others in order for us to build the kingdom of God in our midst. It calls us more to the love of neighbor that we draw from the love of God. This love of neighbor entails our call to go even further in loving those who are our enemies
This will lead the Eucharist to be a source of social commitment since it made from of old the Jews and gentiles to be one by tearing the walls of hostility between them. It can still tear this wall in today’s factions that prevail in society. For example, those between different political parties, different tribes and ethnicities, different religions, gender differences, among others. All these can be broken down by the Eucharist if we allow it to transform us in our lives and hence social change for better.
The Eucharist is food of truth and human need. Thus the synod fathers stress to us that we should not keep quiet when drastic effects of globalization continue like the increase of the gap between the rich and the poor etc. “The food of truth (Eucharist) demands that we denounce inhuman conditions in which people starve to death because of injustice and exploitation, and it gives us renewed strength and courage to work tirelessly in the service of the civilization of love” (SC, 90).
All in all the Eucharist should lead us more in appreciating the love that God had for us in the example of the life of Jesus which in turn we should draw from and express to our neighbor in transforming the world.


*****

REFLECTION 2: THE EUCHARIST AND ESCHATOLOGY
From Sacramentum Caritatis by Benedict XVI
Name: Nkyanungi Oswald                   Reg No: 11045T
In his apostolic exhortation Sacramentum Caritatis, Benedict XVI echoing the synod fathers stresses the importance of the Eucharist as an eschatological banquet. His emphasis on the Eucharist as a gift to men and women on their journey sounds indeed as a reminder to all of us as a people of God pilgrims on earth not to forget the Eucharist as a source in which we should always turn to draw spiritual energy, to have a foretaste of what we anticipate it will look like in the eternal life (heaven) so that we can walk towards our heavenly home confident that salvation is and will be ours.
We are all reminded that everyone was created for the true and eternal happiness which God only can give. However, since all of us were wounded by sin it would be difficult to keep on the right path we don’t experience something of that future fulfillment our main goal which is Christ himself and as our goal we shall be able to see him face to face but he offers a foretaste of himself to us in the sacrament of the Eucharist.
In the dawning of Jesus’s coming, it was a fulfillment to the promises made by God to the fathers of old ( Lk 1:33,70) “In the calling of the twelve, which is to be understood in relation to the tribes of Israel, and in the command he gave them at the last supper, before his redemptive passion, to celebrate his memorial, Jesus showed that he wished to transfer to the entire community which he had founded the task of being within history, the sign and instrument of the eschatological gathering that had its origin in him”(SC, 31). I find this very appealing to all of us Christian to rediscover the vitality that can be generated by the holy Eucharist in our lives. How we gather as a physical reality (gathering) in love and joy to taste and also show to the world how the love of God unites us together and be a sign of God’s presence and hope in the eternal life where God will be all in all.
Finally the Eucharistic celebration in which we proclaim that the Christ who died and rose, will come again in a pledge of the future glory in which our bodies will be glorified.
****


THE EUCHARIST- REFLECTION 1

THE DATING OF THE LAST SUPPER- Pope Benedict XVI
Oswald Nkyanungi (11045T)


As regards the problem of the contradictions of the actual dating of the last supper that arise from the synoptic gospels on one hand and to john’s gospel on the other, I find the synthesis of Pope Benedict XVI in his book Jesus of Nazareth: From the entrance into  Jerusalem to the Resurrection worth for reflection.
The synoptic tradition presents the last supper of Jesus and his disciples as a Passover meal (feast). Though according to Benedict XVI, many scholars present no friction between the prescriptions of the Passover on one hand and the trial-crucifixion on the other. It is highly doubtable that such activities would have been permissible or possible on such an important Jewish feast day. This doubt is supported by mark 14:1-2 where by the chief priests and scribes in their bid to cease an opportunity to arrest and kill Jesus, they declared “not during the feast, lest be a tumult of people” (Mk 14:1-2).
In John’s chronology of events, it is clear that the last supper was not a Passover meal. By this the Jewish authorities who led Jesus before Pilate avoided entering the praetorian in order to avoid being defiled to miss the Passover (John 18:20). In line with this chronology, Jesus dies on the vigil of the Passover – the day of slaughtering the lambs. Even though this theological connection between Jesus’ death and the slaughter of the Passover lambs has led to doubt in the truth of John’s account, it is today becoming more probable than its synoptic counterpart.
Some of the attempts to reconcile the two chronologies seem to point to the discrepancy between the two calendars, that is to say, the priestly calendar with 364 days a year and the Jewish calendar that matches John’s account. I personally agree with Benedict XVI when he sees this attempt as attractive on the face but doubtable due to other problems that remain unresolved historically.[1]
In conclusion I agree with Benedict XVI that his farewell meal was not the old Passover, but the new one in which Jesus accomplished in this context. Even though it wasn’t the Passover meal in line with Jewish ritual prescriptions, its inner connection with the Jesus event (Death and Resurrection) stood out clearly. [Pope Benedict XVI, Chapter five: Last Supper-Dating of Last Supper in Jesus of Nazereth- from the Entrance into Jerusalem to the Resurrection].




[1] Cf. Benedict xvi, Jesus of Nazareth: From the Entrance into Jerusalem to the Resurrection,92